Well we agree on a couple of things like this:
"I would choose to blame the leaders of our classes in the late 80s and 90s who did not clamp down on technology, but let racers spend wildly, often providing those whizzy new parts. It is not a coincidence that the most populated OW racing now is based on cars with 70s and early 80s technology. "
I hadn't gotten around to discussing that particular issue yet, but as an example, nobody really needs floating rotors - yet it drove the cost of each corner well beyond the $60 in extra bolts....There's plenty of other examples, some good, some bad.
But this is where you are dead wrong, and one of the reasons that we keep doing the same stuff over and over again expecting a different result:
"But blaming those leaders/vendors or tire companies ..... certainly is a worthless exercise now. It is too late to even learn from the mistakes made then."
I started out by explaining why the military spends so much time on history - so they don't repeat the mistakes of the past. Virtually every exercise ends with a discussion of lessons learned. The USMC actually has a headquarters organization that compiles and cross-references them all. When new concepts are explored, authors go back to that repository and search through the lessons as they apply to the new concepts. New concepts are run through their university system as fodder for research and dissenting opinions are encouraged.
When your organizations leaders and its participants have no tolerance for analysis or being shown as wrong its beyond help.