I've been reading all of this and think there have been a lot of constructive comments made.
From where I sit, it is obvious that there just isn't enough information to push the spec tire at this time and Dougs' idea is a good middle ground until there is.
If I am forced to answer the simple question of "Would you be in favor of a spec tire?" with a "yes" or "no" answer I would have to say "yes." But that answer doesn't mean I want to be force fed a specific tire to purchase from a specific source at a specific price without any understanding of how that tire will be supported. If someone can present the REAL question with the actual information versus speculation, I think we could all properly vote (which, by the way I wasn't asked to vote but I do drive FM). The off the cuff question only raises more questions versus get us closer to an answer/decision. I understand that the INTENT is to lower costs and level the playing field a bit. A vote is premature without providing any data to support this will happen.
I'm sure Moses' intent is good but I think it is unfair to ask us to vote on something without knowing what we are actually voting for in the long run.
Dan
06